Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 15,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2014, 5:51 am
The case of Kadir v Channel S Television [2014] EWHC 2305 was a hearing for assessment of damages in a libel claim following default judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 8:05 am
In SEC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:16 am
In Johnson, et al., v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:10 am
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
In the case of Haldimann and Others v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
Citing to the New Jersey Supreme Court in the Adams v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:41 am
Never do any of the above, much less all of them.Ignore the above at your half-million dollar peril.Good advice heading into the weekend, I figure. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
While we continue to discuss the article by VC Strine and recently published in the Journal of Corporation Law, we are reminded of Portnoy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:54 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
In the UK, figures from Nielsen, which monitors book sales, showed that one in four consumer titles bought in 2013 was an ebook, up from one in five a year earlier. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 2:53 pm
There’s a very unusual course of events leading up to the innocuous order dismissing the appeal in Foulon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
The US Supreme Court will not decide whether retroactive application of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause in the ungainly-named case of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:37 pm
I very much doubt that the Supreme Court will take up Thomas’ call to overturn New York Times v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
K-TEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 9:52 am
Prior Posts on Section 512(f): * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:46 am
If the parties can’t agree who owns the work, then how can a service provider–who possesses none of the relevant facts–figure it out? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Last week was once again dominated by the Leveson Inquiry, with oral evidence from a variety of high profile figures: some famous for their role in entertainment and sport; others thrown into the limelight by traumatic circumstances. [read post]
