Search for: "Human v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 19,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2016, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He also challenged the Secretary of State’s finding that his human rights claim was clearly unfounded, as this removed his right of appeal in the UK against her decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  Despite the complaints of domestic critics – not just in the United Kingdom – the Court of Human Rights is sensitive to local conditions and issues in Member States. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:20 am by Rosalind English
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS More on this topic: European Court straddles the fence on Yukos Russia violated rights of Yukos oil company, rules European rights court Rate this: Share:EmailDiggLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:37 am by INFORRM
In the case of CICAD v Switzerland (Judgment of 7 June 2016)(French only), the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that a judgment finding that an accusation of anti-semitism made by the applicant was unlawful did not violate Article 10. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by INFORRM
  Just as we (perhaps more so than the French) are transfixed by the surreptitious scooter-shenanigans of President Francois Hollande, the European Court of Human Rights publishes its judgment in a case concerning the privacy of the Finnish ex-Prime-Minister Matti Vanhanen, Ruusunen v Finland. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 1:29 am
Fully six years before the decision in Brown v. [read post]
Ireland Tuesday filed a declaration of intervention in the Registry of the Court in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 12:26 pm by Howard Friedman
  The law also eliminates a prior provision in state law that declared that an unborn child is a human being from the time of conception. [read post]