Search for: "King v. United States Government" Results 1481 - 1500 of 1,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm by Jeff Gamso
United States, 575 F.2d 515, 521 (5th Cir.1978) (poor health); Dows v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  Prejudice has no place in the United States of America. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
For example, we have stated that, "'[w]hen no prior art other than that which was considered by the PTO examiner is relied on by the attacker, he has the added burden of overcoming the deference that is due to a qualified government agency presumed to have properly done its job.'" PowerOasis, Inc. v. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm by Sean Dugan
The takeaway for the American electorate is that the future of the United States, every four years, can be determined by a handful of voters in a couple of states. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
But in the past, monopolies were likely the result of actual government grants. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
The President of the United States withdrew, and the Senate adjourned. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
According to the Heritage Foundation’s 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Canada now enjoys a greater degree of economic freedom than the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
They've cited, most recently, the Court's 5-4 decision this year in Ashcroft v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is often articulated in general terms that would apply to most pseudonymity requests (except perhaps those in lawsuits against the government[2]): [F]undamental fairness suggests that defendants are prejudiced when required to defend themselves publicly before a jury while plaintiffs make accusations from behind a cloak of anonymity. [read post]