Search for: "Levi v Levi" Results 1481 - 1500 of 3,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm by Barry Barnett
As the panel noted, "Ohio allows municipalities and townships to levy excise taxes on 'transactions by which lodging by a hotel is or is to be furnished to transient guests.'" City of Columbus v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:35 pm by Bruce Nye
    Hat tip to Horvitz and Levy's California Punitive Damages, an Exemplary Blog. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:19 am
  This week’s feature is a Writ of Execution of Civil Judgment in the matter of Mary Goodell v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Now it’s being floated in Maryland, against Alabama [my Free State Notes post] “A federal judge in Texas wants you to know she’s sick and tired of whiny lawyers” [Justin Rohrlich, Quartz from December, Brad Heath on Twitter; Align Technology v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
 Last week the IPKat reported on the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-462/09 Thuiskopie v Opus. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm by Bill Otis
 See Justice Scalia's lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The facts in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 16, 2015], are fairly simple. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Wash.) in United Federation of Churches, LLC d/b/a The Satanic Temple v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL for Credit Union Services (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal of LEG BALANCE for athletic apparel over FOOT BALANCE for leather footwear (TTABlog) TTAB reverses refusal to register Cartier Watch design, finding 2(f) evidence sufficient (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps G & F Licensing – Screwed but not a Federal problem: G & F Licensing Corp. v Field & Stream Licenses… [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To succeed on a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in a legal malpractice action, the defendant must present evidence in admissible form establishing that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one essential element of his or her cause of action alleging legal malpractice (see Boglia v Greenberg, 63 AD3d 973, 974; Fasanella v Levy, 27 AD3d 616; Suydam v O'Neill, 276 AD2d 549, 550). [read post]