Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 3,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
New London (U.S. 2004) state eminent domain reforms that mandate above-market compensation for certain categories of takings. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am
China The State Council of China published the Regulations on Administration of Network Data Security, which will take effect on 1 January 2025. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am
On Wednesday 9th March judgment will be handed down in Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 77. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm
As litigation involving Peak was ongoing in London, the liquidators applied for and obtained a recognition order under Schedule 1 to the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (“the CBIR”). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
Dr Mattu declined to sign an action plan drafted by the Trust providing for a year long programme of clinical training in London. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 8:33 am
Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado interpreted a faulty workmanship exclusion in a property insurance policy in The Lodge at Mountain Village Owner Association v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 2:52 pm
©TROUP-LONDON, LLC DBA TROUP-LONDON MUSIC, Universal Music Publishing Group. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:14 pm
Supreme Court in Kelo v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 1:46 am
Today’s case – Sadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department – concerns interventions to stop alleged ‘sham’ marriages. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:21 pm
Life Receivables Trust v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
Liberty along with Haw have tried to challenge those powers under human rights law, but, after victory in the High Court, ultimately failed to convince the Court of Appeal (see Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 532 (08 May 2006).) [read post]
