Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
Here’s a guest post from Katfriend and former Guest Kat Rebecca Gulbul on an attempt by a disappointed entrepreneur to leverage a spot of compensation from an organisation that is known to its users as a body which is far better at taking money than at giving it away, as any visitor to London will know to their cost -- Transport for London. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 7:09 am
City of New London. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 7:09 am
City of New London. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 7:01 pm
That opinion specifically rejected the United State's Supreme Court's conflicting decision in Kelo v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:01 am
COA decides eminent domain case comes from The Indiana Lawyer.Relying on the Supreme Court of the United States case of Kelo v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Subscription Required [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:57 am
New London, recently apologized to petitioner Susette Kelo and told her that he would have changed his vote had he known her full story. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:50 am
Last week in Ward v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
This is also apparent from Article 7, which states that the Directive shall not affect the right of member states “to apply or introduce laws, regulations or administrative provisions which are more favourable to employees. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:36 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
