Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 14,176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
In the products liability case of Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for not disclosing… [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:33 am
Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for not disclosing… [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:05 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 1:12 pm
SC18912 Dissent - Doe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:24 am
The raw statistics show a steady stream of new filings, increasing median settlement amounts, and relatively low dismissal rates for existing cases. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:58 am
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:14 am
LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:03 am
Continuing to play the role of my favorite post-Booker, the Sixth Circuit today has affirmed a below-guidelines sentence in US v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:06 am
Thus, “a practice may be unfair if the magnitude of the potential injury is large, even if the likelihood of the injury occurring is low. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 9:36 am
Lowe, 136 F.3d 1231 (9th Cir. 1991) is still binding and is not overruled by U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
Low-Profile Supreme Court Case Offers Glimpse of Sharp Divide
Legal Times
The case of Bowles v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:53 am
SENTENCING/PLEA AGREEMENTUnited States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
It also means that Nokia-fed Conversant won't ever enforce a German injunction against Daimler over the patent-in-suit, as the troll probably can't afford this amount anytime soon and the patent is going to expire in about a month's time.What the lower court had done in that case--and not only that one, as the appeals court will make a similar decision in a Nokia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
At the heart of McDaniel v. [read post]
