Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 20,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
That won’t work for ROP b/c so much of the regulated stuff is art. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
And this matters. 1. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
Is there a salient difference b/t gov’t lying and gov’t rewarding lies through policy? [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:37 am
And while this needn’t be the standard for all testing, it’s a reminder of how impactful smart testing can be. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:40 am
As pointed out in a more recent decision T 195/09 (unpublished), "In this respect decision T 108/91 has been clearly overruled by G 1/93" (see Reasons, point 2.1.5).In claim 5 of the patent as granted, the artifact detection is based on the variation in the average deviation Daverage. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
We come on the sloop John B My grandfather and me Around Nassau town we did roam Drinkin’ all night Got into a fight Well, I feel so broke up I wanna go home Sloop John B, Brian Wilson As mentioned in a previous Derfel Injury Law blog, the chances of someone getting injured while on vacation are higher than when they are at home. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:36 am
So, here is the advice, Don't Be Afraid to Negotiate. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
When nonconfusing as matter of law, people get used to the practice.Rebecca TushnetJeannie Fromer did the heavy lifting about what has reached legal academics and sometimes law. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:55 pm
While it is a big honor to do so, FIFA risks as great deal on this matter if South Africa doesn't put on a quality tournament. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
PLM argued that the Indian Girl was always the same, and the addition of the words didn’t matter, because in Spanish they were descriptive of the Indian Girl. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:18 am
§ 102(b) as anticipated by Currans is proper.The rejection of claim 56 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 1:55 pm
I didn't go back and check the Court's work, but I don't remember seeing anything directly on point. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 1:37 am
The board thus considers, arguendo, the corresponding case law (see Case Law, V.A.4.10.1, in particular T 1914/12, point 7.2.3) to be good law. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
With preemption analysis perhaps more than anything else on the Supreme Court docket, text matters. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:40 pm
I've nevertheless intended to offer a few cents of my own on the matter for a while now, and so, with Neil's blessing, I post on it now. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 4:47 pm
If you can bear to look at your own transcript, knowing how hard you worked regardless of the letter listed on the paper, all of this really doesn’t matter that much. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 am
In principle classification systems are well known, and this suggests some kind of nearest neighbor classification, so I didn't think anything of it. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
According to G 1/03, “an anticipation is accidental if it is so unrelated to and remote from the claimed invention that the person skilled in the art would never have taken it into consideration when making the invention”.[22] For a given claim, a disclaimer can only be allowed if it excludes the entire subject-matter that has been disclosed accidentally. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:09 am
I have advocated that pooling should be a matter of contractual agreement among the parties. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
The Allegations Aren’t True – Can’t You Just Get the Lawsuit Dismissed? [read post]
