Search for: "MATTER OF C M R"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
The Texas courts said no (I think correctly, as a matter of statutory interpretation), but in Banks v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
Rev. 1 (2009)2245Hemphill, C. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:17 pm
That’s where the specifics of the internship matter. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
Gerald R. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Readers can find an outstanding review of Judge Posner’s opinion (as well as of a less distinguished district court opinion going the other way) in Michael C. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Pappas, Brian M. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:14 am
Deirdre M. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:03 am
It doesn’t matter which order these elements are available, but you need at least three to succeed. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:53 am
In Matter of W-G-R- and Matter of M-E-V-G-, The Board held that an applicant seeking asylum based on his or her membership in a “particular social group” must establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially distinct within the society in question. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
It was a matter of concern that the notices of variation had disappeared en masse and the only inference the court could reasonably draw from the fruitless search of the files was that the notices had never been served on Mrs M. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
C. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
For the answers, look no further than last month’s unpublished decision by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Vito M. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
Soulignons néanmoins que, dans Moore c. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Bartz, Joe M. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
Since I’m taking the time to respond to Weiner’s latest post, I figured I would also note that he has not retracted or corrected his erroneous claim about the D.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:47 am
Now I’m sure the Texas Legislature didn’t really mean to ban any threat by one politician to engage in an official action in order to influence another politician (setting aside the narrow exception set forth in § 36.03(c)). [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:01 am
But Hanson strikes me as even more clearly authoritative on the matter. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
I also caution against the (very common; I’m sure I’ve done it myself) use of the idea of an “instinctive” sense of unfairness. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm
&Rikhof, Joseph 2013 Link International and Transnational Criminal Law Currie, Robert J. 2010 Link International Human Rights Law Freeman, Mark 2004 Link International Law: Doctrine, Practice, and Theory, Second Edition Currie, John H. et al. 2014 Link International Trade Law Johnson, Jon R. 1998 Link Joint Ventures: Legal and Business Perspectives Reiter, Barry J 1999 Link Jury Selection in Criminal Trials: Skills, Science and the Law Tanovich, David M. 1997 Link Labour and… [read post]
