Search for: "Minor v. Black"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 4:36 am
Smith, III, a minor, is the [Scott P. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am
The fact that the New York City Police Department has openly and flagrantly chosen to ignore DeBour (that's the New York flavor of Terry v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
(Ilya Somin) The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that several Asian-American groups have filed an amicus brief opposing the University of Texas’ affirmative action program, which is being challenged in Fisher v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:04 am
After Grutter v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
At most, this was “two minor lapses in enforcement. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
I allowed myself a minor rant on the issue last week in a blog post. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm
Circuit, in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:05 pm
Ct. 2008); People v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:02 am
A glimpse at the charts shows that Indiana ranks “worse” than South Carolina and Texas in registration and voting rates, as well as in black elected officials (Figures I, II and III). [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:06 am
Over half of those stops were of Black people and thirty percent were of Latinos. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:33 am
One trenchant example is Ricci v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:29 am
Zimmerman was diagnosed with a "closed fracture" of his nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back of his head and a minor back injury.... [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:45 am
Forget Mapp v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:36 pm
[O]nly two were minority. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
In Belgium, a Congolese student and a minority organisation sought to obtain a ban on the comic book ‘Tintin in the Congo’. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:52 am
Littleton and Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Supreme Court cases beginning with Plessy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
In the companion cases of Breeden v Black, 2012 SCC 19 (“Breeden”) and Éditions Écosociété Inc. et al. v Banro Corp., 2012 SCC 18 (“Banro”), the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the manner in which courts should determine whether to exercise jurisdiction over multijurisdictional defamation claims involving foreign defendants. [read post]