Search for: "Patrick v. Patrick" Results 1481 - 1500 of 3,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Christopher McKinney
Two weeks ago, several employees at a McDonald’s franchise in Oakland, California filed a lawsuit against their employer, in a matter entitled Hernandez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2005, 6:38 am
HernandezCitation: 2005 WY 142Docket Number: 05-25Appeal from the District Court of Park County, Honorable Hunter Patrick, JudgeRepresenting Appellants (Plaintiffs): Stephen L. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:35 am by Patrick Hindert
Business standards and practice issues addressed in Release 47: Traditional structured settlement business models; Spencer v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:35 pm
Terry, Afghanistan’s Civil War (1979-1989): Illegal and Failed Foreign Interventions Salvatore Fabio Nicolosi, The Law of Military Occupation and the Role of de Jure and de Facto Sovereignty Serena Forlati, The Legal Obligation to Prevent Genocide: Bosnia v Serbia and Beyond Micha? [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:32 pm
" And Politico.com has reports headlined "The Sotomayor PR offensive"; "Patrick Leahy wants Sonia Sotomayor hearings before August"; "McConnell undecided on Sotomayor"; "Dianne Feinstein signals satisfaction on Roe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:05 am
From SSRN:Lawrence McNamara, Catch the Fire Ministries v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 11:16 am by Marissa Cohen
Patrick's Day and Columbus Day parades. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:47 am by Christopher J. Walker
Sobkowski (Yale Journal on Regulation: Notice & Comment (July 3, 2023)) Federal Tort Liability after Egbert v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Lancaster attorney Patti Spencer in her Pennsylvania Fiduciary Litigation Blog Pole dancing and an interesting insight into BigLaw document review - Chicago lawyer Patrick J. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:04 am by Rumpole
"Just less than three years after the Court decided Roe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Cyrus Farivar
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) had an interesting exchange over recent privacy cases with the Supreme Court judicial nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]