Search for: "Read v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 64,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2018, 5:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Does the court of federal claims have jurisdiction to enter a judgment on an illegal exaction claim when the United States had previously awarded money to a recipient under a grant-in-aid statute and then unlawfully recouped the funds? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:29 am by MorelliRatner
Mazda: a victory for consumer safety (Feb. 24, 2011) read more [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:13 am
Saul CornellDepartment of History,Ohio State UniversityThe recent decision in Parker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
The Delhi High Court has read down s. 377 to exclude consensual sex between adults in private in its judgment in Naz Foundation v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:55 pm
In felon in possession of a firearm trial, trial court committed plain error by reading unredacted indictment which disclosed that the defendant had previously been convicted of armed robbery as defendant had offered to stipulate to his felony status, in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here are a few more of her greatest hits for those not hip to her work:Still Convicting the InnocentProsecutorial Exceptionalism: Remedial Skepticism, and the Legacy of Connick v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 10:30 am by Derek Muller
” From it: [A] majority may be willing to sign onto some version of… Continue reading The post Kate Shaw on oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:51 pm by Frank Cranmer
Background In Secretary of State for the Home Department v Harsh Lata [2023] UKUT 163 (IAC), Ms Lata, an Indian national, entered the UK with her children as a visitor in December 2011 and sought asylum in 2015, asserting fear of her former husband. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:40 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
      [1] Lawyers refer to this as the “contra proferentem”rule. [2] Bhasin v Hrynew The post Contractual Terms – What You Read May Not Define Your Case appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:40 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
      [1] Lawyers refer to this as the “contra proferentem”rule. [2] Bhasin v Hrynew The post Contractual Terms – What You Read May Not Define Your Case appeared first on Peter A. [read post]