Search for: "Ruth, Appeal of" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2014, 2:32 am by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which temporarily blocked the trial judge’s ruling. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am by Rory Little
Stephens on Wednesday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked Randolph Schaffer (arguing for Jennings), “May I just clarify it? [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:30 am by Lyle Denniston
Jay for petitioner From the opening question by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg about what facts that appeals court should have examined with respect for the way the trial judge had seen them, to the concluding question by Justice Sonia Sotomayor about why that federal appeals court did not speak more bluntly, the one-hour argument ranged widely over how facts should be interpreted and how they relate — or don’t relate — to legal conclusions. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:04 am by Lyle Denniston
Their appeal to the Supreme Court pressed that argument anew, but the Court declined review. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:33 am
Justice Antonin Scalia issued a dissent, in which Justices Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined, from the denial of certiorari in Jones v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 10:33 am by Joseph Macklin
Although the order was issued without comment, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, joined by Sonia Sotomayor:The Court of Appeals determined that... [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
Second, later in the day the Court (over a dissent by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor) allowed new voting restrictions to go into effect in North Carolina pending an appeal of lower-court decisions striking down those limits. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 4:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
Nelson dismissing the appeal for want of a substantial federal question. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:55 pm by Amy Howe
  A few weeks ago, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had suggested that the Court might pass on the cases this time around because all of the federal appeals courts that have considered the issue so far have struck down state bans, eliminating any need for the Court to step in to resolve disagreements among the lower courts (a factor that the Court often considers in deciding whether to grant review). [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:41 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the mandate in the Virginia cases would issue at 1 p.m., at which point “marriages can then begin. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:21 am by Lyle Denniston
  As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg suggested in public remarks last month, the Court just might wait to see if there is a fresh split among federal appeals courts on the question. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 1:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Some legal scholars have suggested that apportionment of damages by causation is a 20th century reform to the common law[1]. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Commentary If Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was speaking for the Supreme Court on Tuesday night in Minnesota about how the Justices will deal with the same-sex marriage issue this Term, the question just may go untouched for a time. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
   The second portion of the program will present a panel of new voices in Women’s Legal History who study the complex and often contradictory ways in which social, political, and legal actors have appealed to gender and equality in movements of the past, and suggest how such studies might engender/inform equality’s future.The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court of the United StatesWendy W. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit announced that it would rehear the challenge to the subsidies provided to individuals who purchase health care on exchanges established by the federal government. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case as it unfolded last Term focused upon a Maricopa County Superior Court judge, Ruth H. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in 2006 explicitly upheld Nebraska’s ban on such marriages, and they also cite a string of state supreme court decisions against same-sex marriage pleas. [read post]