Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE." Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Santa Clara County (Lehigh Southwest Cement Company, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2016) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, 2016 WL 9540085. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
Strong, et al., McCormick on Evidence § 294 (5th ed. 1999). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
The Glad Products Company et al (Docket Report) Simonian - False patent marking standing motion decided without briefing: Simonian v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Today’s decision should have vindicated, should have taught, this truth; instead, our judgment today has disregarded it.link to case NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS ET AL. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
For that point, the brief sites Seymour v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
The ruling came in the case of Thomas More Law Center, et al., v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:00 am by Pratik Shah
He filed an amicus brief on behalf of America’s Health Insurance Plans, the national trade association representing health insurance providers, in support of California, et al., and the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:18 am by Emma DiNapoli
Drone Strikes in Yemen (Faisal bin Ali Jaber et al v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Standing Armies, Militias, and Individual Rights—The Constitutional Convention of 1787B. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
Now, Kat Neil analyses the recent report by Nobel laureate Professor Joseph Stiglitz et al in which the alternatives to the patent system are explored: Alternative ways for financing and incentivizing research: a Nobel laureate and his colleagues state their case. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The first is a Virginia Supreme Court case, Dunn Construction Company, Inc. et. al. v. [read post]