Search for: "State v. Cornell"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Jaroslawicz v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am
Wells had no protocol, no pre-stated commitment to which years in the dataset he would use, and no pre-stated statistical analysis plan. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
The reason you're limited to the State of Arizona exemptions (and a couple of others) is that Arizona is what's called an "opt-out" state, because it did. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
I live-tweeted about the Google v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm
Cornell Law Professor Michael Dorf, a former US Supreme Court law clerk, and a serious scholar of the Court, discovered that executive experience is predictive of performance on the Court. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:51 pm
Imagine that all representatives of a teacher’s union are white, all those on a particular company’s compensation committee are men, or all the members of a state’s congressional subcommittee on education are childless. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Cornell Bradley 14. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Their counsel placed their reliance upon Professor Martin Wells, a statistician on the faculty of Cornell University. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
The Study that Started the Controversy The original study that launched the controversy over grain feeding was published in Science in 1998 by researchers from Cornell (Diez-Gonzalez et al). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
It believes that “the primary legal materials of the United States are the raw materials of our democracy. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 10:48 am
The suit, Doe 1 et. al. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
How do you think Hamilton would have viewed the state of modern Supreme Court nominations? [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 12:56 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett bucked this trend with her recent recusal from Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. [read post]
