Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2010, 2:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JESUSA ACOSTA, ET AL.; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00110-CV, 406 SW3d 711, 06-26-13) 13-0577 THE FREDERICKSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
The state argues that a trial court does not need to inform a defendant of this judicial sanction, relying on State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
We agree with the district court’s well-reasoned analysis. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
” As applied to older technologies, the rule contemplates that a tracking device may be a mechanical tool used to track the movement of a tangible object., like the beeper attached to a container of chloroform in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
The district court here erred by failing to do so. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
” First, Congress could consider making it easier for certain defendants (presumably former presidents) to move cases from state court to federal court. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
” The District Court dismissed the case on grounds that there was no antitrust violation. [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm
The federal prosecution reached the sentencing stage first, and the district court decided that it should rule on whether the 151-month federal sentence should be served consecutively to or concurrently with the anticipated state sentences. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided Reed v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 11:28 am
Dahda v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Regarding the two claims that were in the ALOFAR, that the District Court found to be purely state law, the Court explains that in its prior precedent in Barresi v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Rev. 1399 (2013) suggests that the discussion of the CAFC on functional claiming might not be completely accurate:In the first half of the twentieth century, the Supreme Court made explicit its objection to functional claims. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Campbell, 378 Mass. 680 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1979).Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:33 am
On Friday, January 15, 2016, the United States Supreme Court accepted the petitioner’s request to hear Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 1:27 pm
The Supreme Court accepted review of the First District Court’s decision in Giraldo, on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicted with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Willoughby v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 1:27 pm
The Supreme Court accepted review of the First District Court’s decision in Giraldo, on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicted with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Willoughby v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm
It does not take much energy to foresee the permutations possible as each MPO [in the state] receives judicial instruction [from six different appellate district courts of appeal]. [read post]
