Search for: "True v. United States" Results 1481 - 1500 of 9,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
Chicago, Illinois - The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has affirmed the judgment of the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:13 am by Eric Segall
My name is Eric Segall, and I represent the United States Department of Education in this matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 248 U.S. 78, 39 S.Ct.40, 63 L.Ed. 138 (1918) and Metlakatla Indian Community v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
”Over 500 cases have cited Mezei with approval, including the Ninth Circuit, which quoted it in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm by Amy Howe
United States, Justice Stephen Breyer concluded that even if the prosecutors had given the defense attorneys evidence that would have been helpful to the men, the jurors likely would have reached the same result. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a disappointing decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am by MOTP
(“While it is true the account agreement Wells Fargo produced is not the same one used in 2002, Wakefield is still bound to the new terms because the agreement states, "[w]e can change or add to any terms of your account at any time. [read post]