Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2013, 7:34 am
This was evident in a decision in November by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:41 am
Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm
Thus, for instance, I find it hard to fault the judges who began to use their enhanced discretion under United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
These new treatments and drugs usually cost significantly more than the established treatment and drugs they are replacing. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:58 pm
At Least, This November 2012 Article In The New England Journal Of Medicine Makes The Point That Something Needs To Be Done Soon, Rather Than Later (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) The June 2011 ruling by our United States Supreme Court in Pliva v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
Parental rights are further protected by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
Parental rights are further protected by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Allen v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:19 am
In 1981 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Michigan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food)… [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
The court relied on United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
The court relied on United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
[Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20] In Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm
Here is the authors’ guest post: On November 5, 2012, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
