Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 1481 - 1500 of 24,102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:11 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Fla. 2019), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained that what constitutes “outrageous” conduct is a question of law. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm by Karen Pita Loor and Cassidy Heverling
The question came to the court in the cases of two men, Jean Francois Pugin and Fernando Cordero-Garcia, both permanent residents of the United States who had lived in the country for decades. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The United States has the world's largest prison population and one of the world's highest rates of imprisonment. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Fyk recognizes he cannot sue the CDA, but neither can he sue the United States in its place. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:46 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, which entails a legal issue that was the subject of the 2023 Gibbons Criminal Procedure Moot Court Competition, where my partner, Gaby Pinzon, and I represented the University of Miami School of Law in winning First Place at the competition. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
On the surface, the overlap is obvious: both articles emphasize the crucial fact that the state makes key distributional choices when it places legal entitlements upon particular individuals. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]