Search for: "Brown v Doe"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 5,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2013, 5:00 am
B Commentary, ¶ 6(b)(7). [6] Guerra v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:16 am
., LLC, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:02 pm
The petition of the day is: Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:21 am
Brown, this one an arbitration dispute from the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
Under the circumstances, the court said, “imposing the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience of this Court,” citing Brown v Safir, 258 AD2d 359, [leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 807]. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
Under the circumstances, the court said, “imposing the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience of this Court,” citing Brown v Safir, 258 AD2d 359, [leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 807]. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:23 pm
” How does Janus affect your agency and how to address its impacts? [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm
Alvarez (stolen valor, where the Court did lift a finger to protect a charlatan); the video game case (Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
Louisville, of course, had required segregated schools under the law prior to Brown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:07 am
State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:46 am
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 305 [2001]). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
The obvious drawback of this “preposterous” position (Lord Brown [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 4:51 am
Supreme Court decided Diaz v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am
Board of Education] does now as nothing more than ‘simple justice. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
Justice Thomas cited last year's decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:11 am
(See Leo v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:00 pm
The question in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
The legal malpractice case is first dismissed: “Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . . . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept… [read post]