Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 1501 - 1520 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm by WIMS
On consideration, in brief summary, the Appeals Court Order indicates, "The petition of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, joined by the State of Alaska, Peabody Energy Company, Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al., State Petitioners and Intervenors for Petitioners, for rehearing en banc; and the petition of the National Association of Manufacturers, et al. for rehearing en banc in No. 10-1073, et al. and No. 10-1167, et… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The much anticipated judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)) was handed down on 2 November 2020. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by John W. Arden
Arden.In adopting a health regulation limiting the sale of “sugary drinks” to containers no larger than 16 ounces, the New York Board of Health unconstitutionally overstepped its authority under the New York City Charter, according to the New York Supreme Court, New York County (New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
” At AntitrustConnect Blog, Steven Cernak looks at the “immediate aftermath” of the Court’s decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:31 am by Peter J. Cavanaugh
"Click here for the rest of this article.NOTE: The lawsuit cited in this article is styled as Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
The judge suggested that such a change would create a "conflict between the proxy rules and fiduciary responsibilities under state law. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:09 pm
Two civil court judges in the Lone Star State got physical in their benchslapping yesterday, reports the Dallas Morning News Crime Blog: It was a reported shoving match between Judge Carlos Cortez of the 44th Civil District Court and Judge Eric V. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
United States (Granted )Docket: 09-11311Issue(s): Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (7th Circuit) Title: Goodyear v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
That is in form exactly the same rationale that the Court has used in the past -- most notably, in Austin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Ewing v Crown Court sitting at Cardiff and Newport ([2016] EWHC 183 (Admin)) confirms an important feature of the open justice principle: that permission is not needed in order to take notes in Court. [read post]