Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 6,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm
Such an arrangement is not found elsewhere within the United States—whether one considers the federal government, the states, or even counties and municipalities—nor is it readily found elsewhere outside of the United States, except perhaps in extreme situations such as post-war occupation or the international refusal to recognize a geopolitical group’s sovereignty in the first instance. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:48 am
Assn. of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:35 am
Surprisingly, the United States Supreme Court has never directly addressed the issue. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm
Defendant contends that he was conducting a protest, but his 1st Amendment rights do not permit him to falsely report an impending fire (see Schenck v United States, 249 US 47, 52 [1919]).... [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
Peterlin was sworn in as Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:59 pm
" The court then ruled that "all proceeds" traceable drug trafficking are subject to forfeiture, even if they are increased due to a windfall.The People of the State of Illinois v. $35,315 United States Currency, 2016 IL App (4th) 150685. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 10:52 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:02 pm
Few insurers in the United States would have paid for such a procedure. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
In the United States, cross-examination is considered an important way to test the truth of a statement. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:11 pm
State and Fruit v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
Heller — have essentially disregarded the precedent of 71 years embedded in the United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:27 pm
Guest post by Shubha Ghosh and Erika Ellyne This post compares and contrasts the United States approach to patentable subject after last term’s Alice v CLS decision, with that in the European Union. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
Cheney of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) gave notice that the investigation of Ericsson's complaint over Apple's alleged infringement of cellular standard-essential patents (SEPs)--with Ericsson seeking a limited exclusion order against certain Apple gadgets and Apple arguing that an import ban over SEPs gives rise to an "unclean hands" defense--has been reassigned to Administrative Law Judge Bryan F. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am
They based their claim on Article 3 but relied by analogy on the high duty to investigate that arose under article 2 of the ECHR when a suicide had occurred as illustrated in R(Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2003] and in R (L (A Patient)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] AC 588. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
TianRui v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Berkemer v. [read post]
