Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 1501 - 1520 of 4,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
App. 2005). 1 The City appealed the original jury verdict, and the case was heard by the Court of Appeals of Ohio inHilliard v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Under MCLA 213.62(1); MSA 8.265(12)(1), jury procedure in condemnation cases is governed by the same rules as are other civil a [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 11:39 am by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
” In addition, the General Accounting Office (GAO) has interpreted 41 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by Heather Donkers
” The fact that it is an element of the offence in s.162(1)(c) that observation or recording be done for a sexual purpose does not make it inappropriate to consider the purpose of the observation or recording in assessing whether it was done in breach of a reasonable expectation of privacy, as required by s. 162(1). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by Heather Donkers
” The fact that it is an element of the offence in s.162(1)(c) that observation or recording be done for a sexual purpose does not make it inappropriate to consider the purpose of the observation or recording in assessing whether it was done in breach of a reasonable expectation of privacy, as required by s. 162(1). [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:36 am by Matthias Weller
Hence, they cannot be regarded as civil and commercial matters in the sense of Article 1(1) Brussels Ibis Regulation. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Walmart first argued that the employee’s discrimination claim under the AMMA, which was enacted by ballot initiative, failed as a matter of law because the statute does not provide a private right of action. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:15 pm by Florian Mueller
Professor Calabresi does not see any indication that such a vote was held, and he doubts that an immediate reappointment was possible, given that some evaluation would firstly have been required. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The EBA had held that Article 53(b) EPC does not exclude plants from patentability, even if they are obtained through an essentially biological process. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:34 am by Gene Takagi
This rule does not apply to the extent the amount paid or incurred is directly connected with an unrelated trade or business which is regularly carried on by the organization.Note. [read post]