Search for: "Hall v. Hall" Results 1501 - 1520 of 6,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2014;60(4):377.[8] Mezick EJ, Matthews KA, Hall M, et al. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2014;60(4):377.[8] Mezick EJ, Matthews KA, Hall M, et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Thailand A Thai Appeals Court has quashed an action of criminal defamation against journalist Andy Hall. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:53 am by Julius Stobbs
The Complainant is jointly owned by the student unions of the University of Leicester and De Montfort University and provides lets in private halls of residence for students of those universities. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and three Resolution Statements from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 18923-17 Dixon v The Sun, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 20931-17 Dixon v Sun.co.uk, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 00918-18 Dixon v Mail Online, resolved via ISPO mediation 00916-18 The Scottish Government… [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:15 pm by Ilya Somin
Jeff Benedict is a prominent reporter and author of Little Pink House, an excellent journalistic account of the events leading up to Kelo v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
Dupont Circle Citizens Assoc. v District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 2018 WL 1748313 (DC App 4/12/2018) [read post]
For example, similar rights already existed under English law as a result of s13 DPA 1998 (which afforded data subjects a right to bring direct claims against a data controller for losses caused by a breach of DPA 1998)—this right was interpreted broadly by the English courts as including a right to compensation for non-pecuniary losses of the type contemplated by GDPR (see Vidal-Hall v Google). [read post]