Search for: "IN RE VIOLATION OF RULE 50" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
Similarly, the District Court also ruled over a year ago that, if Arnao failed to disclose to the board of directors of Citizens Alliance that she had authorized over $1 million of Citizens Alliance’s funds to be used for Fumo’s personal benefit, then she would have been guilty of fraudulently violating the public and charitable purposes for which the Citizens Alliance was created. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
: Aereo’s business model of re-transmitting TV broadcasts without a lice… http://t.co/DzKU7TYAa6 -> Link to 7th Circuit copyright decision in Hobbs v Elton John http://t.co/fjITYsePjT -> Prince copyright infringement case rolls on http://t.co/6AabYlLfog -> Australia data breach law a jobs killer? [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  We’re increasingly mandating this raw/cooked distinction, formalistic. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
In the event an offender fails to comply with the limitations stipulated, that offender is guilty of an indictable offence and may be sentenced to up to five years imprisonment.Although an order can be made for up to 15 years, they are revised every three years, including a full reassessment of risk for re-offence. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 11:59 pm by Jennifer McGrath
  The bill authorizes civil penalties and civil enforcement actions for violation of this provision. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 11:59 pm by Jennifer McGrath
  The bill authorizes civil penalties and civil enforcement actions for violation of this provision. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 11:56 am by Sam Brunson
Violating those rules exposes both the foundation and its managers to various excise taxes. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 9:03 pm
"Ralston wasn't persuaded by entreaties from committee members that they consider the big picture before re-enacting residency and work limits for all offenders, even those convicted as teens. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:37 am by Peter
 Europe is committing a crime against its youth, when 50% of young people in many countries here are out of work. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:45 am
http://bit.ly/coLQWR LinkedIn Evidence In A Lawsuit -- It Was Only A Matter of Time - http://bit.ly/cbgoGD New Case on Employee Privacy Expectations for E-Mails - http://tinyurl.com/yc6cxyn New York State Unified Court System Report Makes Recommendations for Improved E-Discovery - http://bit.ly/9h5vpE Predictability in EDD Rules Remain Elusive - http://tinyurl.com/ybxh5mv Professor Richard Nagareda (Vanderbilt) Essay: Pre-Trial as Trial in Complex Litigation -… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:01 pm
Employers will also have to re-examine the pay rates for their exempt employees. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:17 am by Ron Coleman
  So, was it a good idea to spend a good 50% more on fees (not to mention their markup on donuts!) [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Both existed long before the 2010 court ruling, though Chief Acevedo acts in the story like this is something new under the sun that would have changed departmental practices had he known about it. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm by J.W. Verret
But Texas is a very unique place, and we’re a pretty independent lot to boot. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:37 pm by Schachtman
After Castleman testified, Judge Parkins issued an order to show cause whether the examining defense counsel violated the rules of professional conduct in his examination of Castleman. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
Crudup can go to a different agency, but was initially hesitant to do so because it would require her to re-complete the 50 hours of required training she had completed with CFS. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am by SHG
The use of this feed anywhere else violates copyright. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:26 am by Tobias Thienel
His case was ruled inadmissible at all levels, including by the Federal Constitutional Court (Case No. 1 BvR 1832/07). [read post]