Search for: "J. v. K."
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,648
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
The “Kathy K”. [...] [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:01 am
, Stephen J. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
Meredith J. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am
AE 085: Joint Defense Motion to Compel the Production of Standard Operating Procedure on Force-Feeding. k. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 3:03 am
Die Frau soll laut Gericht die Gefahr des Mannes völlig unterschätzt haben. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 5:20 am
Kershaw, Attorney, Greene County*John K. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
According to reports, the jury award ranks as the third largest ever in a patent case beating out the Apple v Samsung jury award last summer (see this post by Merpel as reproduced in LegalWeek). [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm
Kathy K (The), [1976] 2 S.C.R. 802; Housen v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Bioethics Dunn, Catherine K. [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 11:35 am
In the case of Mullin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 4:04 pm
OFT report also reminded me of another recent Canadian case, Direct Energy Marketing Limited v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm
Faigman, Michael J. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
http://bit.ly/Xp5RPv (Michael Maslanka) eDiscovery and Social Media: Recap from TLI Litigation Summit, Part II – http://bit.ly/QnpRA4 (Gina Rubel) eDiscovery: Resolving Issues Through a Collaborative Approach – http://bit.ly/XBIXES (Martin O’Hara) eLessons Learned: Interview with the Honorable Ronald J. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
See 1930 Tariff Act at §1337(b – j).Sources: K-V Pharma. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:10 pm
K. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:52 am
The applicant must be in one of the following categories at time of enlistment a. asylee, refugee, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), or b. nonimmigrant categories E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U, or V 2. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Full report: Bailii.NHS Trust v K & Ors [2012] EWHC 2922 (COP) (15 October 2012)The issue was whether a lady with cancer of the uterus who lacked capacity should have a potentially life-saving operation. held that she should. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
