Search for: "Jump v State"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 3,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm
But state legislatures from both major political parties are jumping on bills to ban powdered alcohol, mostly on the argument that the new product will increase underage drinking. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
Jack entered the conversation a little later, calling into question the “ law enforcement v. war distinction” in the first instance. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
In People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:52 am
Additional Resources: Bagley v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:19 am
It wasn’t all pretty though, as tribal leadership disputes spill out in federal and state forums. v. # 13 Big Lagoon Rancheria One of the few tribes to make the list by not really winning anything in 2014; in fact, losing a biggie in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:06 pm
Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
The day-by-day schedule, with a brief summary of the issue in each case, follows the jump. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:44 am
The basis for this was most recently stated in Owenby v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
” Gage v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
” Gage v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
” Gage v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
” Gage v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
The Court heard argument Monday in Perez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 6:44 pm
United States, because the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has now affirmed that decision.Like the last Ruling of the Week, Alcan is an important decision in that it counsels against the desire importers sometime have to jump to "essential character" or "relative specificity" to decide between two possible tariff classifications. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
