Search for: "KERR v. STATE" Results 1501 - 1520 of 1,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am by CMS
However, following judgment in the earlier Supreme Court case R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, the view taken again was that the UK Act effectively trumped the Scottish Bill, while it awaited the outcome of this constitutional challenge. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Institute for Justice (2011): Your summarist is asked by his boss for an opinion on the then-recently-filed case Kerr v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am by Marty Lederman
  [UPDATE:  Orin Kerr is right that the decision is obviously redolent of Bush v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am by CMS
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am by Michael Geist
First, a unanimous court in the song previews reset the law with an emphasis once again on balance and user rights: In Theberge v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm by Patricia Hughes
It provides a shield for individuals from arbitrary state action. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:19 pm
  (Orin Kerr's commentary at Volokh Conspiracy -- see, e.g. here; Marty Lederman's and Brian Tamanaha's posts at Balkinization -- see, e.g. here and here; and the continuing coverage at Talking Points Memo are all excellent.) [read post]