Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 8,597
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
Two summary orders of interest:In United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
")AC28349 - Skelly v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 2:14 am
Dear Judge Graham and Magistrate Judge Torres:It is with some regret that I must write you both in relation to the docket in Appel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:26 pm
If an employer lays off an employee without proper contractual authorization or if the lay-off exceeds the time allowed under the above provision, then the lay-off may be deemed constructive dismissal, with the employer liable to provide reasonable notice at common law. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
Reviewing the docket in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Recently, JAMA Network Open published an epidemiologic study (“Williams study”) that explored whether exposure to Agent Orange amoby ng United States military veterans was associated with bladder cancer.[1] The reported study found little to no association, but lay and scientific journalists described the study as finding a “link,”[2] or a “tie,”[3] thus suggesting causality. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:33 am
Circuit Judge Newman filed a dissention opinion to express her view that the patent described a patent-eligible mechanical and electronic device of defined structure and mechanism (Yu v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 7:05 am
” The Federal Circuit also held that the defendants were entitled to sanctions in the form of appellate attorney fees and double costs, against both the complaining individual and his legal counsel (Pirri v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 9:18 pm
The papers lay hidden for more than three centuries having been "misfiled" within papal archives until they were discovered by an academic in 2001. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 7:45 pm
But that is what is happening now in Kennedy v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
In laying down the requirements that will govern the final decision to grant the licenses to one of the auctioneers, the PTS stipulated that the successful network providers would have to observe two conditions: first, any new installation and implementation of central functions for radio usage in the 3400-3720 MHz frequency band may not be carried out with products from the suppliers Huawei or ZTE; and second, where existing infrastructure for central functions will be used for the… [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:39 am
Simcox v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am
In, Panteleris v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
Morton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm
Second, whether a response was timely would depend on the nature of the medical emergency, and a lay juror would require expert testimony in order to evaluate that fact. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:30 pm
” Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:15 pm
Frito-Lay, White v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:02 am
Examples of inadmissible lay opinion evidence include testimony on causation [Stickel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:50 pm
In Michaud v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:00 am
Last month we blogged about the Ontario Superior Court’s decision in Coutinho v. [read post]
