Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 3,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
While one might argue that the class action mechanism renders such knowledge defenses irrelevant as a matter of collateral estoppel, a class benefitting from the Basic presumption is never accurately defined merely as purchasers between dates “X and Y,” but rather should be defined as purchasers between dates “X + Y, who did not know or believe that the misrepresentation was false or that an omission occurred. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Megan J. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:36 am
(b)(1)(A). [5] Sts. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am
(b) She is a paedophile. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:26 am
Class certification is not a ruling on the merits of the case, but only whether the case is one that there a sufficient similarities between all of the class members’ claims that enable to court to decide the matter on a class wide basis. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:02 pm
In terms of the claims under the Fair Trading Act, CPAA objected to (a) a flyer handed out by NZICA representatives at a University careers fair, (b) an advertisement placed by NZICA in two nationwide publications, and (c) comments made by NZICA’s then chief executive that were reported in a newspaper article. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:05 am
However, once again, the Court has failed to further elaborate on the criteria necessary for the classification of an action as an insolvency-related action within the meaning of art. 3 EIR and art. 1 para. 2 lit. b Brussels I-reg. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
C-13-3826 EMC (September 1, 2015). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:05 am
© 2015 Alexander J. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:32 am
As the Circuit court saw the matter: “[T]his approach is not the stuff of science. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
FILE – Kody Brown, center, poses with his wives, from left, Janelle, Christine, Meri and Robyn in a promotional photo for TLC’s reality TV show, “Sister Wives. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
In other words, section 121(1)(c) is not designed to stop improper transactions (which is the core of the bribery provision). [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:33 am
J. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
§355(j)(2)(A). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
B/c I think you mean audience reception. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
But that isn’t the end of the matter. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Code § 2511(1)(c), (d). . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
§ 16(b). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Code § 2511(1)(c), (d). . . .Huff v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Many factors, including inability to leave Berne b/c of other agreements, serve to lock in the existing system. [read post]
