Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
This is yet another illustration of how some people seem to take leave of their senses when using social media. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
As Lord Woolf said in the case of Jones v Warwick, the principle that evidence can be obtained in whichever way one likes, whether illegally or not, must be at least concerning to society as a whole: While this approach will help to achieve justice in a particular case, it will do nothing to promote the observance of the law by those engaged or about to be engaged in legal proceedings. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
If the same team of people was used to determine the question in Article 56, however, the effect would be to make the invention immediately obvious. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:00 pm
The case Friesen v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This largely came down to whether or not the current protesters prevented other people protesting in PSG. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This largely came down to whether or not the current protesters prevented other people protesting in PSG. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
People queued and camped to get their hands on these devices. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
MBL/Inforrm Conference Paper: “Defamation Bill: Trivial Libels and Jurisdiction” – Hugh Tomlinson QC
20 Jul 2010, 4:30 am
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:18 am
It also suggested that the range of freedom of expression had to be interpreted more restrictively when dealing with people who were not political figures or exercising some public function. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In Berkoff v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
They could point out to such people that they might well win under Britain’s libel laws and say, “So bring an action. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am
How not to do a TV interview Zac v Snow The silly season starts soon. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
As Eady J put the matter in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd: ‘Once the cat is out of the bag, and the intrusive publication has occurred, most people would think there was little to gain. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:15 am
Lord Neuberger, the Master of the Rolls, said that “there can be no doubt that the defendants should have the right to express the views which they wish to express; similarly, there is no doubt that they should enjoy the right to assemble together. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
