Search for: "People v. English"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 11:03 am
Confession Was Involuntary State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:05 am
” I can understand translating an obscure Latin phrase into English, but what on earth was he thinking when he translated a perfectly understandable English phrase into the Latin from which, I’ll concede, it was derived? [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 2:11 am
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 5:33 am
It’s when you stop, or the wrong people find out (and they will) that you could discover that perhaps it wasn’t. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 11:12 am
Such forms basically track the Supreme Court's decision in Schneckloth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
The case, Syrnik v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:16 am
Tugendhat J in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414 concluded that there was already a “threshold of seriousness” recognised under common law and he favoured a definition that a statement was defamatory if it “…substantially affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the claimant] or has a tendency so to do. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Nearly two decades ago, Graber contended that Chief Justice Roger Taney’s infamous pro-slavery majority opinion for the Court in Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:50 pm
Salim v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
This was characterised by Lord Pannick in House of Lords debate as the bringing of proceedings ‘by people who have no connection to t [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 2:56 pm
" J.G.G. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
On the other hand, technology can service many people once built and the cost of serving one further person commonly drops as more people are served. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:01 am
And all of them bilingual English and Chinese. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
The Tribunal accepted into evidence the entire text exchange in which genius says he only hires white people who speak proper English (like him). [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:47 pm
The New York case of People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am
The Bookseller reported that the “trade bodies” welcomed the Bill – referring to the Publishers’ Association, the Society of Authors and English PEN. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
Hale was a 17th-century English legal scholar who was notoriously anti-woman (even by the standards of his time). [read post]
