Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 1501 - 1520 of 6,572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It is anticipated that amendments to CCPA will be introduced in the California legislature during the 2020 session on these topics and others. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
” During that final session, Fenton noted that Holmes exhibited an “an angry edge. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by News Desk
  Each year a prominent food safety leader is selected to deliver the Ivan Parkin Lecture at the Opening Session of IAFP’s Annual Meeting.The Association established the Lecture to honor Ivan Parkin, a Dairy Extension Specialist at Pennsylvania State University. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 3:21 am by Edith Roberts
” For the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky previews New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
For judgment, please download:  [2019] UKSC 56 For Court’s Press Summary, please download: [2019] UKSC 56 For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watch the hearing, please visit: Supreme Court Website (29 July morning session) (29 July afternoon session) (30 July morning session) [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:26 am by Ronald Mann
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Georgia v Public.Resource.Org next week, on the first day of its December argument session. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm by Stuart Kaplow
While there was no announcement, the worst kept secret at Greenbuild is that USGBC is that the work on LEED v 5 (.. in lieu of v 4.2) will soon commence in earnest. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
  The session then continued with a panel session on the same issues, moderated by Daryl . [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the case, along with a cert petition filed last week that involves a state-court subpoena for the president’s financial records, observing that “[e]ach case presents the Supreme Court with a separation-of-powers quandary—how to adjudicate a dispute between branches of the federal government in Trump v Mazars; and between the president and state prosecutors in Trump v Vance. [read post]