Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
This came squarely into play last week in Dougherty v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
What's more, it certainly couldn't be inventive [except perhaps in the United States, where a cynic might suggest that the spirit of Cole Porter still haunts the USPTO] to increase the size of the sample of the normal population to achieve that, since that was basic experimental methodology and statistics, while the selection of a database of 1,000 individuals was arbitrary. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:29 am
See Reep v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:56 am
”); Carr v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
More here. and more on music sampling here. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:36 pm
Z o.o v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 1:59 pm
See, e.g., Murphy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:25 am
Abbott Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State of California (March 26, 2014, C070836) ___ Cal.App.4th ___.The 14th District Agricultural Association operates the Santa Cruz County fairgrounds outside of Watsonville. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:01 pm
Here's proof in the pudding: In Jennifer Kaufman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Maryland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:04 am
The Court of Appeals says no habeas relief is warranted, and plaintiff remains incarcerated.The case is McCray v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:31 am
Paying for every last sampled note from a copyrighted song only became standard industry practice beginning in 1991 practice after Judge Kevin Duffy in Grand Upright Music, Ltd v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
., LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:19 am
Realistically, although the statute also provides for proof of intoxication through a saliva sample, this is very infrequent, and in this writer’s experience, has never been the basis for a DWI charge under V & T 1192 (2). [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:00 am
Schofield v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
State, No. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:50 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court issued a ruling several months ago in State v. [read post]
