Search for: "State of Delaware v. Wells."
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
In Brenman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm
Within 45 days of receipt of notice of Liquidia’s NDA, United Therapeutics sued Liquidia in the District of Delaware for infringement based on U.S. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
In M.G., the Third Circuit “note[d] the well-established principle that a federal court sitting in diversity, when called upon to make a prediction of state law, should act conservatively” in reversing a prediction that Delaware would adopt medical monitoring. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:55 pm
At a minimum, however, it does not impinge on the plaintiffs' religious belief that providing insurance coverage for the contraceptives at issue here violates their religion, and it serves HHS's stated interests equally well. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 10:50 am
[10] Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Chris pulls no punches in stating that, while "the issue may be well-settled, it is also well-debated in New York statutory fair value cases because the logic is simply incorrect. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
" The Court of Chancery answers this question in the affirmative in Shiftan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:39 am
Delaware Chancery Court Finally Rules in Selectica Below is news from Steven Haas of Hunton & Williams (we are posting memos analyzing this decision in our DealLawyers.com "Poison Pills" Practice Area): On Friday, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its long-awaited opinion in Selectica v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:14 am
In Smith v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
In 1979, in Delaware v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
I share his view that the filibuster does not really serve us at all well in the 21st century; my only hesitation involves the reality that the Senate is ever more illegitimate in the way that power is allocated. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:20 am
The latest case, Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In July 2020, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:34 am
— United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Because the government moved to vacate defendant's sentence well beyond the 7-day period provided for in Rule 35, the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion or vacate the sentence. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Shure Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
Defendant requests additional time to attempt to find an attorney willing to take this case and/or to conduct research at the County Law Library to be in a better position to proceed pro se with the help of litigation resources available at the law library and the guidance of the library's well-versed staff. [read post]
