Search for: "State v. Baker"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 8:14 am
Susan V. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Baker, 135 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Baker, 135 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
Universal Outdoor Inc., an 8-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-plaintiff State of Indiana (the State) appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Universal Outdoors, Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:59 am
On Wednesday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:47 am
State of Indiana, a 9-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-defendant Karen R. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:24 am
Applies equally to all couples, regardless of sexual orientation.Meanwhile, the Vermont legislature which passed its civil union law for same-sex couples after Baker v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:21 pm
Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:10 pm
Tuesday’s oral argument is in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:32 am
Baker, An Introduction to English Legal History 161 (5th ed. 2019). [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
Baker, 2010 U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
" Baker v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Read with modern spectacles Jacobson looks extraordinarily deferential to the state. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
In the recent decision of Salt Canada Inc. v Baker, the appellant sought an order from the Court directing the Canadian Patent Office to change the records of ownership of a patent. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:15 pm
Rick Hasen discusses the Sanchez v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:04 pm
In Whitaker v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
Prickett v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
