Search for: "State v. Brain " Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,675
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am by Mathews P. George
What is most puzzling is the fact that the very same brains that fail to create on Indian soil do so the moment they land on foreign shores. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:35 am
Danicek suffered brain injuries and was awarded a $5.9-million settlement.In a Mary Carter agreement, Poole paid Danicek just over $1 million. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
There was some medical evidence, which was sharply disputed by the defendants, that the plaintiff suffered traumatic brain injury, which diminished his cognitive functioning to the point where it would be difficult to live independently or maintain employment. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
   “Senate Bills Aim to Help Graduates in STEM Fields Get Green Cards”by Vanessa Kurzweil, RegBlog Staff (July 5)   Two recently introduced bills in the United States Senate are designed to slow the "brain drain" of foreign-born scientists and engineers who return to their native countries after receiving graduate training in the US. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
There was some medical evidence, which was sharply disputed by the defendants, that the plaintiff suffered traumatic brain injury, which diminished his cognitive functioning to the point where it would be difficult to live independently or maintain employment. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
There was nothing to show that the film has been shown on television or distributed on DVD in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
As plaintiff was removing beams from the level above, and dropping them onto the deck, the deck broke, causing him to fall and sustain brain injuries. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
As plaintiff was removing beams from the level above, and dropping them onto the deck, the deck broke, causing him to fall and sustain brain injuries. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
gives a keenly-awaited Opinion in Joined Cases C-274/11 and C-295/11 Spain v Council and Italy v Council. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm by Andrew Langille
The panel stated that tweet (4) was "crude, insensitive and failed to adequately capture the context of the Professor's conduct" as the professor was "role-playing an individual with organic brain disease". [read post]