Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1501 - 1520 of 15,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
That would be especially true if a state law treats reasonable use of geolocation technology as an adequate defense when geography matters—for instance, when reasonable even if imperfect geoblocking attempts are seen as evidence of lack of intent to target a particular state for personal jurisdiction purposes,[24] or when reasonable geolocation attempts are seen as sufficient for determining that a defendant's copyright infringement happened within the… [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
” The court chose not to analyze Prongs A and B because Prong C was not satisfied and the failure to satisfy any prong dooms any company from establishing independent contractor status because the ABC test requires that all three prongs must be proven. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm by Gregory Schick
The Final Rules add a new section (v) to Item 402 of Regulation S-K that require certain public reporting companies to describe the relationship between the executive compensation actually paid by the company to its NEOs and the financial performance of the company over a specified time horizon and to disclose each of the following in a prescribed tabular format. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from a case called Richey v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
But other states (such as Pennsylvania) follow the usual "republication rule," under which repeating Glenn's accusation, even in the course of reporting on the dispute, could lead to defamation liability.[10] There are many other important differences among state libel laws as well.[11] All those state libel rules have potential extraterritorial effect on Fox. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]