Search for: "State v. Core" Results 1501 - 1520 of 7,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 8:31 am by Rosalind English
London Christian Radio Ltd and Anor v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre (RACC) and Secretary of State for Culture – read judgment The High Court has upheld the refusal of the broadcasting regulator to clear an advertisement for transmission on the grounds that it offended the prohibition on political advertising. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:26 pm
" The brief also disputes arguments by the state of Texas that the case is now moot, and that the Supreme Court has already decided the core issues involved. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm by Josh Blackman
A ruling that electors are "subordinate" state officers would undermine the core reasoning of Thornton, and, perhaps, Powell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Handgun Control Federation of Ohio and Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Bd. of Trustees of Univ. of Ala., 104 F.3d 1453, 1464 (4th Cir. 1997) (“where the core of the state law theory of recovery … goes to wrongful copying, … it is preempted”); Daboub v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:19 am
It should have been evident to state courts that, when Blakely emerged, it was simply an application of Apprendi's core holding, he contended. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Thus, Montana’s core legal question is: are more efficient irrigation methods outside the scope of Article V? [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:11 am
Warren, Brennan, and Fortas subscribed to the Memoirs variation; Black and Douglas asserted that obscenity was constitutionally protected; Harlan held to his Roth view; and Stewart thought that both federal and state governments could suppress “hard-core” pornography. [read post]