Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 1501 - 1520 of 16,386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by Dennis Crouch
In one of them, LKQ asked the court to rule that the current primary reference requirement for design patent obviousness, as stated in In re Rosen and Durling v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Petitioners’ position is that state legislatures are freed from state constitutional constraints when they make decisions… Continue reading The post <strong>The Profound Ahistoricism of Moore v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Each year, scholars at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy estimate cigarette smuggling rates for each state.[1] Their most recent report uses 2020 data and finds a strong positive relationship between cigarette smuggling and tax rates across U.S. states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The majority expressed some doubt about whether that tire chalking is actually a search under the physical trespass theory of United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
  And the pre-FOIA cases do not present a strong case for breaching the deliberative process privilege without some particularized showing of need. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
  Under these circumstances, there is a strong pressing need to safeguard national security in HKSAR to prevent riots and civil unrests of any magnitude from happening again. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:57 am by Brett S. Krantz
” A recent decision in the state of Ohio should cause all independent firms to re­examine the true value of a Swiss verein structured entity (RevoLaze, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:49 am by Karen Gullo
This is particularly true in India, which lacks strong legal safeguards and data protection laws. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So this brings up two central questions: First, is it true that a Herculean justice, seeking unequivocal “right answers” to the questions posed by the United States Constitution, will feel forced by her oath of office to recognize a strong protection for the “right to keep and bear arms”? [read post]