Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm by JD Hull
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The Supreme Court has not made a full-scale decision on legal issues at Guantanamo Bay since its 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 4:03 am by Mario Machado
In an Order on Guidelines Calculations in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 10:30 am by Brian Cuban
  Much like the standards of obscenity spelled out in Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:13 am by Ed Felten
The DC debate, which is dominated by lawyers, has no trouble accepting the relevance of every last detail of the statutory history of Section 215 or the wording of opinions in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am by Dave
It is also interesting to read about the focus on the local etc (it's all a bit nauseous by now tbh) while at the same time appreciating that the effect of the value for money driver in social housing provision/regulation is to drive mergers/agglomerations in the sector to achieve economies of scale (para 41, ch 3) - localism or nationalism? [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
The issue is not clear cut, as there is a strong argument that whilst the right to peaceful protest is crucial to a functioning democracy, this does not mean that people can protest wherever and whenever they like. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:40 am by Pedro Letai
They and five other people were arrested and charged with embezzlement, fraud and gross misadministration over a racket that allegedly diverted large sums from SGAE to private firms controlled by executives from the collecting society. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:02 pm by David G. Badertscher
During the search, the police discovered a machine gun, rolling papers, and a digital scale. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Relying on performance means scaling down the industry. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by GuestPost
The ‘Junk’ decision in 2005 (C-188/03, Junk v Kuhnel) has meant, that worker consultations need now take place before any final decision on job losses is taken. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm by Adam Wagner
Public Inquiries proliferated under the previous government, albeit on a much smaller scale than the Saville Inquiry. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  Today, it is more than hard to imagine the Court ushering in such a regime on a grander scale. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]