Search for: "**jackson v. Long" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 5:43 am by Lorene Park
Fireworks For example, I could not help but admire an 81-year-old, long-time security guard who complained not that he was disabled following his heart surgery and hospitalization for flu, but that he was “regarded as” such by his employer, which thereafter relegated him to acting as a courier (Shaffer v Greater Hazelton Health Alliance, MDPa June 5, 2013). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by Nitin Pardal
Collins Fire Protection Co.) or if an employee was approached on a “cold call” by an employment agency (Jackson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by Schachtman
White Hat Bias Hyping environmental and so-called toxic risk has gone on so long that many Americans have no sense of the truth when it comes to the causal consequences of personal, occupational, and environmental exposures. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:40 am
So long as the unfunded organization remains free to engage in its activities (including anti-American propaganda) “without federal assistance,” United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am by Susan Brenner
As to how the case arose, the Complaint says Cruz Lopez, “who is a citizen of and is domiciled in Mexico”, for years flew to the United States to spend holidays with his long-time friend, James Fox, a U.S. citizen who “is domiciled in Amarillo, Texas. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
Jackson, 12-694, the Ninth Circuit state-on-top habeas case we know and love. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Jackson, 12-694 (fourth relist since the record arrived); the Seventh Circuit Establishment Clause case Elmbrook School District v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Gordon Firemark
_r=0   Stories we mentioned, but didn’t discuss   Suit over hiring of Michael Jackson doctor to go to trial: Findlaw: http://news.findlaw.com/apnews-lp/4f991b3055614ec5b3c59d6f866333ab     Katherine Jackson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:59 am by Jamison Koehler
Court of Appeals clarified the third requirement of constructive possession – the element requiring “intent to exercise dominion and control” — in an opinion it issued last week, Jackson v. [read post]