Search for: "BAKER v. BAKER"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 4,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
Stewart Baker posted the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 5:11 am
Matthew Kahn posted the Oct. 1 joint unclassified filings in the Qassim v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
Baker (07-219), on the legality of the $2.5 billion punitive damages award resulting from the Exxon Valdez oil spill under federal maritime law. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 3:34 pm
Baker, Judge Paul D. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:00 pm
The issue in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 4:04 am
In an interview for NPR, Nina Totenberg previews King v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm
In Bright v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 9:11 am
Baker-White cases. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
At 253 (3), which has been expanded to require that “'supervisors had a legitimate purpose'” Baker v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
In Baker v Irondequoit CSD, 70 NY2d 314, the Court of Appeals held that a union's duty to process a former employee's grievance, under some circumstances, survives the employee's separation.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_07272.htm [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
First, I think Judge Sutton is most apt to accept the view that the Supreme Court’s 1972 summary refusal to hear an appeal in Baker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Honeywell v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
Baker, The Impropriety of Expert Witness Testimony on the Law, 40 U. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:32 pm
In this context, CAAF’s 3-2 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:58 pm
As we previously noted, in its New decision, quoting Baker v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 4:32 pm
Baker is to 21st-century jurisprudence what Dickens' Jarndyce v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:30 pm
Judge Erdmann's concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
The chairman went to great lengths to ensure that the formalities of debate were meticulously observed Regular readers of this weblog will recall that, following the United Kingdom Supreme Court's recent decision to grant permission to appeal against the Court of Appeal's controversial ruling on the application of the "temporary copying" exception in NLA v Meltwater [2011] EWCA Civ 890 [noted by the IPKat here; criticised by Lionel Bently here], Baker… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:30 am
The modern political question doctrine first emerged in Baker v. [read post]
