Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 14,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
" In the event the petition before Supreme Court raises a question of whether an administrative determination is supported by substantial evidence the proceeding should be transferred from the Supreme Court to the Appellate Division to address that issue. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
Importantly, the Supreme Court in Cuozzo Speed Techs. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:17 pm
In Firstline Transportation Security v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 11:20 am
Bus. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Estate of Myers v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Estate of Myers v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:49 am
Yesterday, KC Johnson twitted of the 128th loss in federal court by a college sued for its handling of campus sex policing in Doe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:21 am
In Jarkesy v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm
The pending cases are: Spanish Court Two Condominium Association v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In Markley v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:14 pm
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
*In PHH the Circuit Court concluded that a federal administrator appointed for a fixed term of office may only be removed for cause after notice and hearing. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
*In PHH the Circuit Court concluded that a federal administrator appointed for a fixed term of office may only be removed for cause after notice and hearing. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
An appointing authority has wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates, and this discretion is particularly broad in the hiring of law enforcement officers, to whom high standards may be applied.* As long as the administrative determination is not irrational or arbitrary and capricious, courts typically will not disturb it. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
An appointing authority has wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates, and this discretion is particularly broad in the hiring of law enforcement officers, to whom high standards may be applied.* As long as the administrative determination is not irrational or arbitrary and capricious, courts typically will not disturb it. [read post]
11 May 2023, 3:15 am
And that determination was upheld by the Comptroller’s Office.When a special administrative review proceeding [pursuant to Article 78] was filed with the Albany County Supreme Court, the matter was transferred to the Appellate Division, Third Department, which agreed that, based on the record’s “substantial evidence,” the incident did not “constitute an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:15 am
District Court for the Northern District of Indiana: Micheau v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:28 am
Danielle Orr, as Administrator of the Estate of Daniel Orr, et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:57 am
In Swint v. [read post]
