Search for: "Doe v. Choices, Inc." Results 1521 - 1540 of 3,248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Simply paying an employee a salary does not necessarily mean the employee is not eligible for overtime. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:28 am by Joy Waltemath
Congress expressly stated that SOX and Dodd-Frank supplement existing remedies, so they could not bar the CFO from proceeding (Becker v Community Health Systems, Inc., September 17, 2015, Johnson, J.). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
App. 2004] (Nixon does not preclude common-law claim), Reserve Solutions, Inc. v Vernaglia, 438 F Supp 2d 280 [SDNY 2006] (same), and Nightingale & Associates v Hopkins, 2008 US Dist LEXIS 90204 [DNJ Nov. 5, 2008] (Nixon precludes common-law claim). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
Mere conclusions, expressions of hope or unsubstantiated allegations or assertions are insufficient" to overcome a motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Prudential Home Mtge, Co., Inc. v Cermele, 226 AD2d 357, 357-358 [2d Dept 1996]). [read post]