Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 4,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
VA rates these residuals on a scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, or total, with each of these increments corresponding to a disability rating: Scale Rating 0 0% 1 10% 2 40% 3 70% Total 100% VA divides the rating criteria of TBI residuals into 10 subcategories in order to evaluate the condition. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm
VA rates these residuals on a scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, or total, with each of these increments corresponding to a disability rating: Scale Rating 0 0% 1 10% 2 40% 3 70% Total 100% VA divides the rating criteria of TBI residuals into 10 subcategories in order to evaluate the condition. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 10:40 pm
This is in line with our research, in that it does NOT show .05 is the reason for impairment,” Corgliano said to FOX13. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
§ 25-1-503 is constitutional. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
PiS faced the European Coalition, a group comprised of the Polish moderate right, the centre-left and the Green party which came second in the election with over 38 per cent of the vote. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 7:31 am
However, VA is not allowed to consider age when making decisions on claims for TDIU, as outlined in 38 CFR § 4.19. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm
However, VA is not allowed to consider age when making decisions on claims for TDIU, as outlined in 38 CFR § 4.19. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:14 am
Code Section 38-99-20(C)(1) [Section 4(C)(1) of the Model Act].More particularly, S.C. [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:59 am
No revenue or asset threshold.[38] Same as NAIC model.[39] Same as NY Regulation.[40] Fewer than 25 employees. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:36 am
Issue#1: 38 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:36 am
Issue#1: 38 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am
Does the finding that (a disclosure in) a prior art document D1 does not qualify as an accidental anticipation (thus not allowing the use of an undisclosed disclaimer) because it does not fulfill the criterion laid down in G 1/03 that it is so unrelated to and remote from the claimed invention that the skilled person would never have taken it into consideration when making the invention, imply that it is automatically relevant for inventive step? [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:51 pm
Similarly, a person charged with a state jail felony prostitution case (who does does not a previous conviction for that state jail offense) must be placed on probation. [read post]
25 May 2019, 6:00 am
VA outlines TDIU regulations under 38 CFR § 4.16, which includes subsections (a) and (b). [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Carter, don't chill free speech and freedom of the press, what does? [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:39 am
No. 1). [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Rather, the Sixth Circuit’s decision binds only federal courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee.13 Accordingly, California public agencies remain free to argue that that the decision was wrongly decided because (1) chalking does not constitute a “search” and (2) chalking is reasonable as a matter of law even if it constitutes a search. 1. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
Hacker, 83 N.Y. 1, 8 n.1 (1993). [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm
” While that respect is appreciated, it does not carry the same legal weight as legislative protection. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Because the record does not contain this evidence, we affirm the court of appeals' judgment in part, reverse as to the award of attorney's fees, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.I. [read post]
