Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 4,617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
It says Amendment 41 does not apply to “home rule cities or counties that have adopted charters, ordinance or resolutions that address the matters covered” under the amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am
This could be done by inserting a new section 41.1(5) (based upon current numbering) along the following lines:For greater certainty, it is deemed always to have been the law that s. 41.1(1) does not apply to any acts permitted by sections 29, 29.1 and 29.2.[4] 6. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Texwinca states that it does not have a controlling influence over Megawell, and that it has no responsibility for the working conditions at the factories in Vietnam. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:58 am
41 California privacy lawyers, professionals, and professors are urging the California legislature to make major changes to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which the legislature hastily passed in 2018. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
Reminder to the US: 1. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:45 pm
§2252A(b)(1) Mailing, transporting, or receiving, or possession with intent to sell child pornography (second or subsequent sex based offense) 15 years 40 years 22 (41-51 months) 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
With its letter of 13 May 2016, the appellant filed a new main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
” 2019 01 10 order denying stay UPDATE (Background materials): 1 complaint 15 motion to dismiss count ii 18 response 19 reply 23 dct order granting 15 28 george motion for summary judgment 32 response 34 reply 40 us motion to stay 41 amended motion [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Coming next, with a much more modest 41 cites to the lower-court opinion, is Biestek v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm
Georgia [2018] ECHR 740 [41]). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 pm
Gen. 422, 433 (1984) interpreted 41 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
That burden does not fall on the appellant. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 2:46 pm
As has been the case in prior years, the SIC Code category with the highest number of securities class action lawsuit filings in 2018 was SIC Code category 2834 (Pharmaceutical Preparations) which had 41 lawsuit filings during the year, representing more than 10% of the federal court securities lawsuits filed during the year. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Ruth served as the Trustee until 2002, when, by judicial modification, she resigned, and the Trust was divided into four trusts of equal value, named after each of their four children.[1] Ruth is the sole beneficiary during her lifetime, and upon Ruth's death any remaining assets in the four trusts pass to the trust's namesake. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 4:13 am
Furthermore, since EUTM 1 does not designate any particular colour, its protection also extends to colour combinations including the combination of red and white. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
¶ 41. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
The Court held that the plain language of Rule 702 does not memorialize Frye; rather the rule requires an epistemic warrant for the opinion testimony of expert witnesses. [read post]
