Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 2,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2011, 7:01 pm
There is $700 billion in negative equity in the US. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:52 am
Does this make sense? [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
This declaration comprised four parts, i.e. (1) the declaration of the intention to abandon the patent under consideration; (2) the intention not to accept the patent as granted; (3) the intention not to amend its text; and (4) the intention to waive OPs. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
What the case does demonstrate is that, to the extent that the effects of the changes can be predicted, they are likely to have a disproportionate impact in certain areas and on certain groups in those areas, and all for a saving of £1 billion from a £22 billion hb bill. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
What the case does demonstrate is that, to the extent that the effects of the changes can be predicted, they are likely to have a disproportionate impact in certain areas and on certain groups in those areas, and all for a saving of £1 billion from a £22 billion hb bill. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
Then there is the role which has been conferred upon this court by the statute, if called upon to do so, to judge whether or not Acts of the Parliament are within its legislative competence: see section 33(1) and paragraphs 32 and 33 of Schedule 6, as amended by section 40 and paragraphs 96 and 106 of Schedule 9 to the constitutional Reform Act 2005. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am
., 152 N.J. 86, 96-99 (1997) (quoting N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.8)).] [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Corp., 96 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Part II: Summary and Criticisms of the Advisory Panel’s Recommendations 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
Policy of Broad Pretrial Disclosure Regarding Corporate Interests In Jaffe v Jaffe, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4089440 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) defendant served 37 nonparty subpoenas on the business office maintained by plaintiff's father. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:49 am
The continuous representation doctrine does not contemplate such intermittent representation (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d 1, 9; Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 167-168; Loft Corp. v Porco, 283 AD2d 556). [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In summary, A 113(1) does not merely require a party to be given an opportunity to voice comments; more importantly, it requires the deciding instance to demonstrably hear and consider them (T 763/04 [4.4]; T 246/08 [2.6]). [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:25 pm
Pub L 97-320, 96 Stat 1469. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:25 pm
Pub L 97-320, 96 Stat 1469. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:30 am
1. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
He was therefore satisfied that sections 1(1) and 4(1) are compatible with Article 10 of the ECHR. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 12:15 pm
I will now explain in a little more detail: 1. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
[1] 1987 CanLii 2692, [2] Re: 0708964 B.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
[1] 1987 CanLii 2692, [2] Re: 0708964 B.C. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
This claim read:1. [read post]
