Search for: "Gay v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 3,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Omnicom Grp., Inc., 852 F.3d 195, 200 (2d Cir. 2017) (finding plausible discriminatory intent where a supervisor explicitly stated that an openly gay plaintiff “must have AIDS” because he was “effeminate and gay”; Sassaman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 5:05 am by Marty Lederman
As I explained in these two posts, the plaintiffs in Miller v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The suits were brought by couples who objected on religious grounds to the state's requirement that they be willing to accept any child regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.In Antonucci v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm
During the taped interview, M.R. opened the laptop, demonstrating that the phrase `gay teen porn’ auto-populated when he typed `ga’ in the search box. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:18 pm by Howard Friedman
One of the most interesting and least-commented upon aspects of Justice Kennedy's majority opinion (see prior posting) in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:32 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Both the Virginia ruling and other similar recent decisions relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:58 am
Griesbach on a pending suppression motion in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:43 am
The Michigan Supreme Court finally came down with their opinion in National Pride at Work v Governor of Michigan. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
We’ve previously discussed the Illinois appellate court’s 2013 decision in Fifield v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:23 pm by Suzanne Ito
United States This week the Supreme Court heard arguments in one of the big cases of the term, Arizona v. [read post]