Search for: "HOWARD v. STATE"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 2,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 1:02 pm
(Thanks to Howard Bashman of the How Appealing blog for the alert to this petition.) [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
See Menges v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
United States, 12-8543, that concerns the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:07 am
In Horne v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Taxation Gleckman, Howard. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
United States: A Haitian-American journalist has been ordered to never again publish anything about the prime minister of Haiti [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am
He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
In Dastar v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
” (Hat tip: Howard Bashman.) [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:22 am
I take to twitter There are several L&T barristers on twitter - @cjr1968 (Catherine Rowlands) referred me to the case of London and Westminster Loan Co. v London and Northern Western Railway [1893] going on to say “Don’t think there’s a case that specifically states the rule but it is right. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:20 pm
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:20 pm
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
In Florida one can get a DUI on a bicycle, State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
United States, 220 F. [read post]
