Search for: "Harris v. Does" Results 1521 - 1540 of 3,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 4:33 pm by Zosha Millman
Deere – Patricia McConnico, managing editor of the Texas Bar Journal, on the Texas Bar Blog China Joint Ventures: The Tide Is Out – Harris Moure’s Dan Harris from Seattle on the firm’s China Law Blog [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:04 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: At NYU Law Review Online, Matthew Christiansen previews next week’s oral argument in Hughes v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Evan Harris also condemned these changes as “all “press release” and no “press regulation,” and questioned why IPSO did not consult the public over these changes “and instead negotiated in secret with a secretive industry body. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am by Ackerman Law Office
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am by Ackerman Law Office
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
Admiral Harry Harris’s assertion last week that the United States would “clearly defend [the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands] if they are attacked by China. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am by MBettman
Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007) (“[a] police officer’s attempt to terminate a dangerous high-speed car chase that threatens the lives of innocent bystanders does not violate the Fourth Amendment, even when it places the fleeing motorist at risk of serious injury or death. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm by Law Lady
Costs -- Section 57.105 does not provide mechanism for recovering costs GRAND RESERVE AT TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and BUSINESS LAW GROUP, P.A., Appellants, v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
Harris for this blog. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]